The Matriarchy Michael White
- 3 years ago
- 38
- 0
Rules For The Worldwide Matriarchy - Alternate History free porn video
I am a fan of matriarchy and gender role reversal stories. I'm also a fan
of science fiction, and my favorite science fiction is the type where I
find a good deal of plausibility.
Lately I've been trying to imagine a world where women are not only the
dominant gender, but there is role reversal. Where women end up being the
aggressive sex, and men are passive and obedient. It does seem pretty
believable to me that if women held power for several millenia there
would be role reversal, e.g. wearing dresses does not seem like some type
of biological imperative peculiar to one gender.
The million dollar question is if women had power for 300 years would
there be a conscious effort to keep power by putting rules in place to
"keep men down"?
This would be an alternate reality with a couple of rules:
1. No physical change would be involved. Body types remain the same, men
are larger and stronger than women. Genitals on both sexes are the same
as on real earth, and women would still have breasts.
2. There is no attempt by either sex to become the opposite sex. Men
don't wear fake breasts, women don't bind their chests, etc.
3. There are only two genders and they are evenly distributed (50%
female/50% male).
4. Women and men are still paired, they do physically desire each other,
and there is romantic love between the two sexes.
5. No magic is involved.
My understanding is that there if there have been any true matriarchal
societies, they have been extremely rare. I am talking about a sizable
society where women are in control of all institutions of power. There
are plenty of examples of matrilineal cultures, in which property is
transferred through woman's lineage, and matrilocal cultures, where the
couple will reside with the wife's parents. These should not be mistaken
for female power, and in many cases ends up being the exact opposite.
It is hard to envision just a couple matriarchal societies developing and
lasting over time. All or nothing would seem to be more realistic. In the
absence of any sizable numbers of matriarchal societies it is hard to
imagine an entire world where women rule without some sort of "trigger".
The trigger I'm proposing is something very topical, namely a pandemic.
It occurs 4,000 years ago, about 2000 BC. It affects both sexes, but in
females it has a mortality rate of 10% while in males it has a mortality
rate of 85%.
The pandemic is not a one shot thing, it lasts 300 years. That is time
enough for many generations to pass, written and oral histories to take
place, and maybe most importantly, for mythologies to develop about what
happened and to assign "blame".
The world population in 2000 BC has been estimated at 27 million,
presumably split evenly by gender. Using some assumptions, I come up with
a world population 300 years later of 3 million, of whom 86% are female.
The question is what happens during those 300 years?
Societies would have to re-structure to accommodate the new reality.
There were definitely advanced civilizations at that time (Egypt, China,
India, South Asia, etc.), and there is no reason that they could not
adapt. More primitive, smaller cultures might die out.
What happens during the 300 years? In year 1, there would be panic,
confusion. Since males dominated these civilizations women would have to
step up and replace the men. All the functions that were almost
exclusively male, such as government, military and hunting would have to
be done by women.
Over time society would adjust, and a true matriarchy would have to form
with the few men remaining (and being born) relegated primarily to
breeding duties to keep the population going.
Note that after the 300 year period of the pandemic it would only take
about 60 years for society to have a 50/50 gender split.
I'd love to hear anybody else's thoughts on this.
My hypothetical progression for how men's roles would evolve is:
1. Initially revered, recognized for their special role in replenishing
society and encouraged to do so, need to preserve so kept away from
harmful tasks.
2. Sheltered, required to do their duty in terms of breeding, begin to
mythologize men in negative terms.
3. New generations of men taught to obey women, blame is assigned to men
for angering goddesses.
4. Men considered little more than servants, raised to be docile and
timid, fear women.
5. Pandemic ends, as percentage of female and male births equalize there
is a conscious effort to keep men subjugated to women
6. It might take some time but eventually the family structure would
return, only now women would be the head of the household.
7. Societies codify into law men's subordinate role, religions develop
stories and parables to justify the subjugation of men (Adam took the
first bite of the apple, not because he was evil, but because he was
foolish, showing that males need to be guided by women)
8. Development of social costumes to reinforce limitations (burquas,
bound feet, chastity devices)
9. As family structure reappears males seek a mate for protection,
needing to attract women by dressing in ways that women find pleasing.
Therefore, it would be males who would paint their face and wear alluring
clothing.
Something obvious that would affect all societies
Anything to do with pregnancy and the birth process would be light years
ahead of what we have now. Contraception, abortion and day care would
never be a major controversy. Safe birth procedures would be the highest
priority.
There would be much less of a hunger problem, especially in modern times
as there would be few unplanned pregnancies. It would be much more likely
that countries would be able to feed their populations.
Questions
1. If women ran things could the worst of women be as bad as the worst of
men?
I use as an example the Rape of Nanking in 1937, during the Sino-Japanese
War. I've seen a couple documentaries on it, and it is hard to imagine a
single event in a war any worse, past or present. I don't believe that
the worst of women would be as bad as the worst of men. I'm biased
because women bear children, and it is hard to imagine female soldiers
raping and then bayonetting infants like was done in the Rape of Nanking.
I assume it is easier to be bad if you are somewhat dissociated from the
birth process, which is just not possible for women.
2. Could women treat adult males as poorly as men have treated adult
females throughout history - little more than property, beatings, rape,
etc.
I don't see any reason why not.
Status throughout history
Males were raised to be submissive and obey women. They learned to be
docile and timid around women. Needing a wife for protection, both
physical and economic, men made themselves pretty to attract a mate, They
wear dresses and makeup, remove their body hair. Every culture was
different but for most of recorded history males were chattel. An old
Chinese saying summed things up very well:
Before his marriage a man was under the authority of his mother or,
should she have died, of his nearest female relation. As a husband he
lived in subjection to his wife, and as a widower is subservient to his
daughter or, if he has more than one, to the eldest.
The human body
There are no changes to the human body. Man are still larger and tend to
have more upper body strength than woman. However, much of that
difference is offset by women being strongly encouraged to do weight
training and play physical contact sports while men are discouraged
The ideal body types are different. The ideal body for a male is lean and
toned, while for women it is heavily muscled. In practice men tend to be
closer to ideal than women since a man's appearance is more important
than a woman's. Women who are not muscular are often fat.
Sex
As in all elements of society women are the aggressors when it comes to
sex. They pursue men aggressively and many women brag about their sexual
conquests. Women talk about getting laid and the men they've fucked. It
is the men who are strippers and prostitutes, and it is the men who worry
about walking alone in a city at night for fear of being sexually
attacked. And it is the women who leer at men, objectify them, and
frequent strip clubs
All that being said, men are active and willing sexual partners. Pretty
much all traditional sexual activities are in play with a couple of
exceptions. No woman would allow herself to be on the receiving end of
anal sex. Instead it is the woman who penetrates the man. This has not in
any way replaced vaginal intercourse, but anal sex is part of most
couple's sexual activity. Also, sexual positions that are "power
positions" for males would probably not be acceptable to many women.
Female masturbation is accepted much more than male masturbation. Males
are encouraged to be chaste prior to marriage, whereas girls will be
girls is the attitude for females.
Clothing
Women wear the pants, men wear dresses and skirts. There are no laws
against men wearing pants, but no business would permit it, and most
women would have a problem with their husband or boyfriend wearing pants.
Men wear lingerie and stockings as well as high heels.
Corsets and other form fitting undergarments are very often worn by men.
There is a lot of pressure within society for a man to dress in a manner
pleasing to his wife or girlfriend.
A man would never appear in public with his entire chest bare. A man's
nipples are objects of sexual interest to women, and are always kept
covered outside of the house. If a strip joint is not topless, a stripper
would wear pasties over his nipples or face possible arrest.
Part of a man's basic wardrobe is an item called a bassa, which is
similar to a brassiere except it is of lighter weight since it does not
provide support. The bassa is usually made of lace and would be covered
by a blouse or a dress.
Women, on the other hand, can go topless if they chose to do so, as there
is no sexual connotation to a woman's breasts (obviously women still can
get sexual pleasure from having their breasts touched).
Things common to all countries
Wars
Early on as common as current reality. Definite possibility of wars
during the pandemic for purpose of gaining more males to increase
reproductive capabilities. Perhaps that would carry over even after the
pandemic to the concept of men being the spoils of war.
Naming Conventions (general concept only)
Women are Miss whether married or single. Single men are Mister (Mr.) or
Misteren (Mrn.) if married. Males are generally in subordinate positions
in their jobs, and would never refer to their female boss by her first
name. Typically it would be Ma'am, or if less formal it may be Miss with
her surname. If a man and a woman are at the same level, which would
usually only happen in a large company, the man would still use Miss
surname to the woman while she would call him by his first name. In
general men rarely call any adult female by their first name unless they
are family or very close friends.
This is actually great progress. It is only in the last 25 years or so
where a man would even use his wife's name in public. Prior to that it
was considered disrespectful, so if a man was to his wife or talking
about his wife he might say "Miss Karen".
Even in 2020 a male of any age or a group of males are generally referred
to as boy or boys.
Heavy Lifting
It is universally acknowledged that men are the more delicate sex. Men
tend to refrain from lifting heavy objects in public. If a couple is on
vacation the woman would always be the one to lift the heavy suitcases.
And yes, a woman is expected to carry her husband over the threshold
after a wedding.
Religion
All of the older religions emphasize men's subordinate role to women.
That is very basic and has driven social structure for thousands of
years. There are not very many modern interpretations, and a lot of
resistance to any change in thinking. Every religion has their own
version of a creation story, but the common thread was that women needed
to be in charge and men needed to obey.
Intelligence
Until fairly recently it was universally accepted women that were more
intelligent than men. There is a lot of pushback in developed countries
to that in the last 25 years.
Hair
A man's hair has a very interesting role in society. It is thought that
the ancient Egyptians were the first society where men were expected to
have braided hair when they appeared in public. Over time, long, free
flowing hair on an adult male became a type of sexual attraction. Since
for most of recorded history adult males were the property of their
wives, eventually loose hair was something only a wife or girlfriend was
entitled to see. Ultimately this ended up being another way for women to
subjugate men.
It was considered obscene for a male to be seen in public with completely
loose hair, and eventually most societies made it illegal. In public men
always wore braids or buns, and if they had children they usually wore
them at home also.
When a boy hit puberty and had their "talk" with their father, one of the
things they were warned about was to slap away a girl's hands if she
tried to free his hair. An exotic dancer stripping for women would often
end his set by freeing his hair from a tight braid.
I got the idea for this from a science fiction story I once read that had
women wearing masks. There was a part of the story where someone marveled
at the idea that it only took 50 years for sexual interest to shift from
women's breasts to women's faces.
The United States
The third amendment to the constitution classified all male persons in
the United States as juveniles who required an adult female guardian to
make all decisions, especially regarding money and health. This
essentially prevented males from having any self-determination. A man
could be forbidden to work by his guardian or, worse yet, even forced to
work at a job he might hate. This led to a certain amount of abuse when
it came to medical decisions, including women having their husbands
sterilized when they decided they did not want more children.
Until the early 1900's there was no consideration of rights for males. Up
to that point a large portion of men could not read or right, since it
was not considered important to women. Men were expected to cook and
clean, look after the children, and be a source of pleasure for women in
the bedroom. With the advent of the industrial revolution a new source of
labor was needed. Secretaries, clerks, and lower level jobs needed to be
filled, so men made their way into the workplace.
The last second half of the 20th century saw a fledgling men's rights
movement. Progress was slow, but in 1972 the 25th amendment overturned
the third amendment, and males were given adult status when they turned
20 (females enjoy full adult status at age 16). In 2000, the 27th
amendment gave adult males the right to vote.
Things have changed in the last 25 years. There is somewhat of a
dichotomy in society. People over 40 grew up in households where a male
of any age would not dream of disobeying an adult female, while younger
people are growing up in more egalitarian households.
That being said, even in 2020 men are still deferential to women. Once a
man is married it is assumed that the woman will be the head of the
household and make the decisions. However, there is some pressure for
change that includes a rising masculinist movement, that focuses on equal
opportunities for men.
Summary of what things are like in 2020 for this Alternate Reality
1. Women are very aggressive, more aggressive than men in our current
reality.
2. For the most part men are still raised to be passive and submissive,
but there are increasing numbers of households where that is changing.
3. There is very strong societal pressure for men to "respect the
authority" of women. You still have men curtseying to women in powerful
positions.
4. There is complete role reversal in terms of clothing.
5. In developed countries there has been a large increase in the number
of men going to college, but only about 15% of men go to college versus
60% of women.
6. There are very few males in the professions such as doctors (the few
who are exist tend to specialize in men's problems), lawyers,
politicians, etc.
7. Institutions that hold power (military, government, judiciary, and
corporate executives) are almost all female. The only real role in the
military open to males is as a nurse, and international accords
specifically forbid men in combat roles.
8. It is still very common for women to physically punish their husbands.
Most couple discuss this issue prior to marriage and they at least end up
on the same page with some type of rule system. This is a completely
separate issue from physical abuse. In this world it is accepted even in
2020 (I struggled with this because the concept is pretty repulsive, but
it certainly wasn't uncommon in the US in the 1950's, all you have to do
is look at media from that period). It is not acceptable at all to
physically punish children.
9. It is somewhat unusual for a woman to skip out on a marriage if there
are children involved (in comparison to men in current world).
10. The world population is much lower for the earlier mentioned reasons.
11. Wars and disputes between nations are less common compared to or
current reality, based on less overpopulation.
12. Men's position in society is probably closer to what it was in the
1950's in our current reality
13. Women are protective of men (and mothers especially of their sons),
but that comes with a large element of possessiveness.
In the age of Trump I have decided that if women were in charge from the
outset they couldn't possibly do as bad a job as men have. That being
said, in this alternate reality woman have subjugated men more completely
than the reverse in our current world. No particular reason, but I think
it makes for more interesting stories.
I've never written a story but I'm going to try to put one together. I
retired two years ago and prior to then I didn't use the internet for
much other than work. I was always in technical analysis type jobs when I
worked, so I probably have not written more than a few paragraphs in 30
years unless it involved graphs and analytical data, and I expect to
struggle.
By the way, any comments on these thoughts would be welcome, and anyone
who would want to use any of these ideas is more than welcome to do so.
Cheryl
- 12.09.2022
- 32
- 0
The Matriarchy Aimee Brodeur
- 4 years ago
- 23
- 0
The Matriarchy Clara Koch
- 4 years ago
- 23
- 0
