Femme Your Hubby Instalment 1
- 4 years ago
- 29
- 0
Femme Your Hubby - FAQ # 3 free porn video
Title: Femme Your Hubby - FAQ #3
Author: A. K. Remenko
Questions should be e-mailed to [email protected]. Flames
and the like will be ignored and cheerfully deleted. Questions
will only be accepted if in the form of standard text email. E-
mails with attachments will NOT be opened. Questions don't
necessarily reach the list predicated on frequency only, those
that are especially illuminating or illustrate basic concepts well
or are of special academic interest will move to the head of the
class. Not for dissemination to minors under any circumstance(s).
Preface to FAQ #3: The author is getting email with attachments
and wishes to request of readers that they not send these. Due to
the proliferation of computer viruses (and the fact that most
writers are not personally known to the author) the author will
not open such mail. The author wrote to all who did this to advise
them. Some of THIS email bounced as writers had supplied
fictitious email addresses. (!!!) This simply reinforces the
author's concerns. Please accept the author's humble apologies for
not having stated this policy sooner. Mea culpa.
Further to FAQ #3: It appears as if some "straight macho male" has
found this series and taken offense. In addition this "person" has
evidently succeeded in enlisting the aid of similarly inclined
friends in bombarding the author's mailbox with all manner of
trash. How this wizard manages to explain to his accomplices what
he was doing at FM in the first place is beyond the author's ken.
The author is being accused, among other things, in these pathetic
missives of being a traitor to the male gender even though that's
an assumption. (See item 20 below. Also,"trater" is currently the
preferred spelling it seems. In addition the words "course",
"coarse", "to", "too" and the always reliable "there", "their" and
"they're" evidently present the same unfathomable challenge as
elsewhere on the web.) The author yawns through invectives, but
they do take time to read and dispose of and more importantly
clutter up a small mailbox. Readers are respectfully requested to
be patient, yet again, if e-mails bounce due to this hopefully
short-lived flood.
Further to FAQ #3: The author made a near unpardonable oversight
upon submission of the final part of the paper (Installment #5).
While thanking others the author neglected to thank the author's
patient and skillful editor at FM for wonderful effort
consistently provided. Publishing the editor's name would not be
appropriate without prior consent. You know who you are. Thanks.
To the mail and an interesting group it was:
15. How do I get my wife to femme me WITHOUT her knowing out that
it's precisely what I want?
Answer: Here's another case where having a sure-fire answer could
make Dr. Remenko filthy rich. A great number of letters were
received along these lines but this one was selected because it
was brief and right to the point. Many writers added all sorts of
superfluous rationalization and excuses, not this gurl, straight
from the shoulder.
The author has no clue on how to make someone consciously aware of
something, without the subject's knowledge that one wants it so,
save two methods. The first would be to engage the assistance of a
third party who can be trusted (not an easy thing these days!) and
the second would be delivery of the message subliminally. (Maybe
consult another FM author as to a reliable source for
"medallions"?) The author's experience in psychology sadly does
not extend to the subliminal. The author has extensive experience,
unfortunate and cynicism-producing experience, with those reputed
to be "trustworthy".
Perhaps a looped audiotape that repeats "femme your hubby, read A.
K. Remenko at fictionmania.tv" endlessly while the wife sleeps
would do the trick. The author has extreme doubts about the
viability of this approach. (One can imagine what might occur if
the wife awakes from slumber unexpectedly!) Further it presupposes
that the wife in question is even web-active to begin with. (Maybe
leave Fictionmania cookies lying about, or "forgetting" to clear
browser history would work? Although, how is their presence
explained away?)
The author empathizes with all such writers' conundrums. As noted
elsewhere the direct approach (e.g. "honey, when you get a chance
would you please femme me?") is something aspiring TGurls shun
because of the fear of an adverse (read explosive in the megaton
range) reaction from the wife. (Younger readers not familiar with
it should see post blast photos of Hiroshima, Japan circa August
1945 to gain some inkling of what some gurls fear albeit
metaphorically.)
As to third party intervention, the prospective wife will probably
only be approached successfully by another GG known to her and one
that has shown previous ability to communicate rationally with the
wife. Chances are somewhat better that a large high heel shaped
asteroid will intercept Earth's orbit around the sun and land
squarely on the wife before this occurs, thereby rendering the
whole issue moot anyway.
The author does NOT mean to make light of a desire on the part of
gurls who want the wife to femme them, nor does the author feel
anything but empathy for their plight. One of the reasons the
author wrote this piece in the first place is the hope that some
wives might discover it and either be interested themselves or
refer another wife to it. The author admits that this will be at
best an infrequent occurrence, however SOME chance is better than
NO chance and it was the best the author could envisage as an aid
to gurls everywhere.
The sad truth is that most gurls weigh all the alternatives,
frequently for a lifetime, and do nothing. This is due to the fact
that what they desire is evidently not deemed worth the risk
required to be assumed in order to obtain it. This reaction is
true of many things in life that all persons encounter in many
spheres and negative judgment of others' action in remaining
passive in such situations is presumptuous at best, so the author
won't do it.
Writers' desire to have their wives do it without knowledge that
the gurl wants it so simply underscores the gurls' fear that the
wife will achieve "critical mass" upon learning the truth. Gurls
with this fear have it for good and sufficient reason in that they
are best placed to predict the wife's reaction and it may be
inferred they've already done that. Having said all above the
bottom line choices are to wait, do nothing, risk nothing and
probably get nothing, or conversely, act, risk everything and
probably get nothing too. Not a happy choice.
16. I femmed my gurl because it seemed like a fun way to kill time
which I have plenty of on my hands. Now I'm regretting it because
she looks prettier than I do! I mean really pretty! I got her to
start going out and now I want her to stop because I am quite
frankly jealous of the way she looks and the attention she gets.
Everybody wants her, guys, TG's GG's you name it. It got to me so
much I stopped going out with her. I told her fun was fun but
enough was enough and I didn't want her going out as a gurl any
more; if she wanted to still dress she could only do it at home.
Can you believe it? She refused to go along with my demand! How do
I get her to solve her problem?
Answer: Dear wife you have lost control and, as counseled in the
paper proper, once lost it is difficult to regain. Irrespective of
her level of "physical interaction" with "admirers" of any stripe,
the author does not like your odds. It is the author's thesis that
one of the reasons gurls love being gurls so much is that in
western culture women have virtually all the "sexual power".
Before being femmed prospective TGurls have no knowledge of how
having this power feels. (Much like men who wish they had it, even
though all they really know is what NOT having it feels like.)
Once the deed is done and they get a taste of sexual power having
them give it up is about the same degree of difficulty as, say,
recalling an orgasm.
You empowered her to be a gurl but did not maintain CONTINUING
CONTROL of the process. Well she likes where she is and you put
her there and she's got the perfect excuse, it was your idea! Talk
about a purely guiltless environment, this is it. Contrast this
with the unfortunate gurl who has to do everything "on the sly"
and is beset by a constant fear of discovery and ostracism.
Remember anticipation of gain and fear of loss, the motivational
factors? What does she have to fear losing from going out now?
Nothing. What does she gain by staying in? Nothing. What does she
LOSE by staying in? Plenty. (Ego satisfaction, self-esteem, and
etc.) The author is glad you have a lot of time on your hands
because you're going to need it to "fix" this, if indeed you can.
The author chortled when reading your question, specifically the
part about it being your gurl's "problem." 'T isn't so; it's YOUR
problem. The author is unsure precisely when you lost control but
guesses it was not recently. Your gurl is clearly very confidently
telling you she KNOWS you're not happy with this state of affairs
and she is not in the least concerned.
Happily enough, for you, the author has seen this situation before
and has at hand a solution for YOUR PROBLEM. First, you must
regain control and about the best way to do it is for her to
regain respect for you that she has clearly lost. She likes being
pretty and THAT'S what she respects now, so you're going to have
to get competitive in that arena. Secondly, you're not going to
regain any semblance of control sitting at home while she's out
partying her tush off.
You never said how easy or difficult it was to femme her in the
first place but the author's bet is that it was a walk in the
park. The author reads one highly predisposed subject here, maybe
already even a closet T before you commenced the process and the
author also bets you never took the time (though you admit you had
plenty) to find that out. Well, now you need to femme YOU, so
you'd better put that time to good use. Gym, wardrobe, makeup,
hair all sound familiar? Once she perceives you to be a member of
HER peer group, you've got a shot at retrieving some level of
respect and hence some level of control. Not as much as you'd like
certainly, but c'est la vie.
The author acknowledges at least grudging respect for the writer's
honesty in actually admitting she was jealous. This is something
many wives are seemingly incapable of admitting.
17. I am writing to apologize. As you well know, my wife started
femming me a many months back and she used a lot of the techniques
in your paper. I found your work through a TGurl friend I met
online. I was pretty angry with my wife and especially with you
and, as you also know, wrote you some really nasty email. My wife
however never stopped and now that I'm further along I can see
it's all really for the best. I'm happier now than I can ever
remember being. I didn't see the wisdom of all this then but I do
now. My stress related symptoms have disappeared; the last
conscious decision I recall making was deciding on a new shade of
lipstick. I am free from worry and care. I sincerely apologize for
the things I wrote to you and instead wish to thank you for having
helped my wife so. I can only hope you can find it in your heart
to forgive me.
Answer: Done deal. The author never took what you wrote
personally. (As an aside, the author has seldom had the privilege
of being vilified with such gifted use of English vocabulary and
grammar, the author's compliments!) As to your threats of physical
violence the author was unconcerned. Having achieved an age that
makes the author somewhat less physically vigorous the author has
opted instead to become heavily armed. The author's constant
companions (Msrs. Smith and Wesson) are deemed by author fully
capable of handling any threat in close proximity.
In a more serious vein, the writer's reaction was not atypical of
initially more resistant subjects. The writer is simply more
intelligent and/or lucky than most in either deducing what was
occurring or being given a hint. It is the author's opinion that
in this writer's case it was more the former than the latter. No
matter, all's well that ends well.
While it may appear the author is publishing this letter to
provide the author with a self-indulgent "pat on the back",
nothing could be further from the truth. (The author would hope by
this time that his level of professionalism and academic
detachment would place the author above such suspicion!) Instead
this letter is offered as incentive to those wives dealing with
the, occasionally twin, demons of resistance and self-doubt. Rare
indeed is the wife who sails smoothly through the process without
encountering one or the other.
The process requires unflagging determination and patience. Such
difficult work is from time-to-time bound to result in at least
minor setbacks than can adversely impact even the committed wife's
level of self-confidence. Such women need to be reminded that it
really is, in the long run, beneficial to the subject and all the
more weight is added to that statement when supported by an
admittedly reluctant subject.
This writer WAS extremely angry but all her angst has been
dissipated as should be apparent from her most recent
communication presented here. Many wives report post process that
signs of male temper outbursts and aggressive hostility are a
thing of the past. The author has heard some speculation that
infiltration by females into the armed forces of many nations is
in fact a feminist conspiracy aimed at "femming" the military
establishment and rendering future armed conflict impossible.
While the author has his doubts (more than three females agreeing
on ANYTHING seems a bit of a reach, contract bridge foursomes
being a prime example) the author would concede battalions of
mini-skirted TGurls unlikely candidates for pre-emptive strikes by
security conscious and unallied nations.
This wife also faced informed resistance (!!) that is one of, if
not THE, most difficult challenges a wife can face. Most TGurls
don't tumble for quite a while but this one was put "in the know"
early on and her wife prevailed irrespective of that fact. The
author is filled with admiration for such craftsmanship. The gurl
concerned is fortunate indeed to have such a skilled wife.
18. My boyfriend takes no end of delight in kind of "rubbing my
gurl's nose in it" about the fact that she is a complete cuckold
and that my boyfriend can do with me pretty much as he pleases
with me sexually. I admit that at first I found it amusing to
watch her suffer such humiliation, but now I'm not so sure. Should
I maybe say something to my boyfriend or side with my gurl on
occasion?
Answer: The author finds unpleasant anyone who is gratuitously
mean spirited and cruel. However, do not underestimate the
tolerance, nay the NEED, which some gurls have for this type
environment. Experienced boyfriends of Twives (A Twife is the
spouse or SO of a TGurl, e. g. you) generally have a pretty good
feel for how much is enough and how much is too much. If your
boyfriend has such experience the author would recommend deferring
to that. Even some first timers can be remarkably astute about
this. One sure way to get rid of your man is to start siding with
your sissy.
However, the best gauge is as always your sissy's level of
happiness and contentment. If she is obedient, consistently defers
to you and seems well satisfied, things are probably OK. Warning
signs would include marked changes in behavior especially as
regards the amount of time she spends femmed. If that would
decrease significantly look out. Another bad sign is a TGurl who
formerly looked forward to watching the wife getting mounted by
the boyfriend suddenly losing interest.
A positive sign would be consistent and frequent masturbation
especially when the boyfriend is around. If there is a better
barometer for sissy satisfaction it has not come to the author's
attention.
19. My gurl is a "sissy milking" fiend. I am amazed at her ability
to have this done, especially her recovery time! She could never
do that when we were actually having sex as man and wife. Forget
twice a night, twice a week was something. She's been very good in
other respects. The house is immaculate; she cooks like a gourmet
and really seems genuinely happy for me when I have gentleman
friends visit. It's not like sissy milking takes that long. One
thing hasn't changed and that's her tendency to premature
ejaculation. If it weren't for that I'd have arms like Arnold
what's-his-name.
I was assisting her the other night when she was wearing her
maid's outfit. Something was vaguely familiar but I couldn't place
it. She was on all fours as usual and something about her position
and that black and white outfit rang a bell. Then it hit me! As a
child I had stayed with an uncle who was a dairy farmer with a
herd of Holsteins! I was in the barn many times when they hooked
up the cows to the milking machines. Isn't there some kind of
appliance or equipment or something that could handle this chore
in a similar way?
Answer: The author is frankly appalled. The author has a hard time
imagining a more impersonal and mechanical and dare one say lazy
approach to this virtually sacred obligation. The writer is
getting her "ticket punched" by multiple boyfriends and would
begrudge her gurl some personal pleasure? This activity makes for
constructive bonding and provides a wife and her gurl the
opportunity for some "quality time" together. The writer admits
near perfection in her gurl and would still deny her this? It
seems to the author precious little indeed to ask and the author
hereby upbraids the writer for her lack of compassion.
There are other concerns as well. In the event such device(s) are
battery powered the expenditures made for replacement batteries
could rival the annual GNP's of some small nations. Improperly
re-engineered secondhand dairy equipment might be too powerful and
result in a TGurl that resembled a waffle, as would inadvertently
connecting a 110-volt "sissy milker" to 220-volt service. The
writer should focus less on convenience appliances and just do her
job.
20. I've been reading this series since it first started and am
puzzled about one thing. You use the third person exclusively in
referring to yourself and never use gender specific pronouns that
would give me a direct clue to your gender. At times I'm pretty
sure you're a guy and other times I'm not so sure. Are you a man
or a woman?
Answer: Yes.
21. Well, I've done it. Mine's femmed and bitched; I started well
before your series did but I admit I found a few useful things.
I've encountered something I find curious however. Mine is
sexually active as a gurl, even gets off from getting her backside
plumbed. She can't be in gurl mode all the time as she
occasionally has to impersonate a man because...(all the usual
reasons - author). One thing I noticed is she's very functional
when in gurl mode (no hormones yet) but TOTALLY non-functional
under any conditions in boy mode. Is this common?
Answer: "Common" probably overstates the frequency with which SPP
is observed. SPP is short for the "Stick Pussy Paradox", precisely
what the writer describes. It's paradoxical primarily because it
has the nasty habit of occurring LEAST when it is desired (e. g.
wayward, reforming, skirt chasing hubbies) and MOST when it's not
(e. g. the allegedly "straight" CD). SPP is another item in the
"go figure" category.
Variants include for example TGurls who only achieve erections
while femmed and observing the wife being humped vigorously by a
man or more rarely a wife servicing several men simultaneously.
This is another subtopic ripe for academic research but one can
imagine the difficulties involved. Advertisements for those
wishing to aid in pharmaceutical research (where they have a 50%
chance of getting a placebo and get paid to boot) abound. It's
tough to imagine much of a response for a study seeking TGurls who
only achieve erections watching their wife getting splooged by a
squad of studs. The lifestyle moves more toward mainstream
acceptance, though in small steps admittedly, all the time.
However, the author fears that it will be some time before society
is far enough along the trail to support a carefully analytical
look at certain of the issues presented here.
SPP is, the author believes, further evidence of a genetic link to
the whole T issue. The author would like nothing more than go
about to acquiring yet another PhD, this one in microbiology, and
have at it. That academic task would likely require many months
and the author, like the writers, has to eat. Thus does base
necessity halt the advance of mankind.
End of FAQ #3
Blaze
- 25.11.2022
- 26
- 0
Femme Your Hubby Instalment 2
- 3 years ago
- 24
- 0
Femme Your Hubby Instalment 4
- 4 years ago
- 27
- 0
